1 Yozshuramar

Rick Hautala Bibliography Creator


  • A NOVEL by Peter Crowther
  • PUBLICATION DATE: February 2011
  • EDITION: Jacketed Hardcover
  • COVER ART: Glenn Chadbourne
  • PRINT RUN: 500 signed by Peter Crowther
  • INTRODUCTION: Rick Hautala
  • ISBN: 978-0-979505-48-5


It’s just a book that the folks of the small town of Magellan Bend recall reading. A little gruesome, perhapsand, in more than one instance, not the reader’s usual fare. But it’s just a book. Nothing more.
But when the town’s resident sleeper awakes from an eight-year nap, his memories are much more than mere words and phrases in a cheap and gaudy horror novel. And as he becomes more and more aware of the shocking truth, the knowledge spreads like graveyard mist sending a clarion call far and wide . . . but not only to the townsfolk. No, indeed. There are other things out there, things that ride the night winds on All Hallows Eve . . . and they know a lot more about the events recorded in the fabled By Wizard Oak And Fairy Stream.
Clearly, there is unfinished business in Magellan Bend this October and, as the night turns smoky and the world settles down for the onset of winter, the visitors arrive. Again . . . And no, it’s not just a book . . . No way.

Heart rate variability biofeedback: how and why does it work?

Paul M. Lehrer1,* and Richard Gevirtz2

1Department of Psychiatry, Rutgers – Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, Piscataway, NJ, USA

2California School of Professional Psychology, Alliant University, San Diego, CA, USA

Edited by: J. P. Ginsberg, Dorn VA Medical Center, USA

Reviewed by: Robert P. Nolan, University Health Network – University of Toronto, Canada; Robert Lake Conder, Carolina Neuropsychological Service, Inc., USA

*Correspondence: Paul M. Lehrer, Department of Psychiatry, Rutgers – Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, 671 Hoes Lane, Piscataway, NJ 08854, USA e-mail: ude.sregtur.smjwr@rerhel

This article was submitted to Psychology for Clinical Settings, a section of the journal Frontiers in Psychology.

Author information ►Article notes ►Copyright and License information ►

Received 2014 Jun 5; Accepted 2014 Jun 27.

Copyright © 2014 Lehrer and Gevirtz.

This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

Front Psychol. 2014; 5: 756.

Published online 2014 Jul 21. Prepublished online 2014 Jun 15. doi:  10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00756

This article has been cited by other articles in PMC.


In recent years there has been substantial support for heart rate variability biofeedback (HRVB) as a treatment for a variety of disorders and for performance enhancement (Gevirtz, 2013). Since conditions as widely varied as asthma and depression seem to respond to this form of cardiorespiratory feedback training, the issue of possible mechanisms becomes more salient. The most supported possible mechanism is the strengthening of homeostasis in the baroreceptor (Vaschillo et al., 2002; Lehrer et al., 2003). Recently, the effect on the vagal afferent pathway to the frontal cortical areas has been proposed. In this article, we review these and other possible mechanisms that might explain the positive effects of HRVB.

Keywords: heart rate variability, biofeedback, resonance, baroreflex, homeostasis


In recent years there has been substantial support for heart rate variability biofeedback (HRVB) for a variety of disorders and for performance enhancement (Gevirtz, 2013). Since conditions as widely varied as asthma and irritable bowel syndrome seem to respond to this form of cardiorespiratory feedback training, the issue of possible mechanisms becomes more salient. The most supported possible mechanism is the strengthening of homeostasis in the baroreceptor (Vaschillo et al., 2002, 2006; Lehrer et al., 2003). Recently, the effect on the vagal afferent pathway to the frontal cortical areas has been proposed. In this article, we review these and other possible mechanisms that might explain the positive effects of HRVB.

In the 1990s Lehrer et al. (2000) began experimenting with a form of cardiorespiratory intervention that has subsequently been labeled HRVB, respiratory sinus arrhythmia (RSA) biofeedback, or resonance frequency feedback (RFF). The procedure consists of feeding back beat by beat heart rate data during slow breathing maneuvers such that the participant tries to maximize RSA, create a sine-wave-like curve of peaks and valleys, and match RSA to heart rate patterns. RSA is the heart pattern that occurs when heart rate increases during inhalation and decreases during exhalation. Thus as can be seen in Figure ​1, the participant uses feedback or a breath pacing device to produce the characteristic maximized RSA.


A typical HRVB screen showing the transition from normal breathing to 7 breaths per minute breathing.

Gevirtz (2013) recently reviewed all of the available literature on the outcomes of HRVB. He looked at the following application categories: asthma, COPD, IBS, cyclic vomiting, recurrent abdominal pain, fibromyalgia, cardiac rehabilitation, hypertension, chronic muscle pain, pregnancy induced hypertension, depression, anxiety, PTSD, insomnia, and performance1. While few areas have extensive support by way of controlled studies, the overall picture seems to be very promising for this intervention. As can be seen, the applications are quite varied. We have begun to explore what physiological and/or psychological mechanisms might be contributing to these positive outcomes.


Heart rate variability (HRV) has a complex structure, often referred to as “chaotic,” involving various superimposed oscillation frequencies, non-linearly related to each other (Ivanov et al., 1999; Pikkujamsa et al., 1999). Some processes involved in this pattern are caused by known reflexes, some with modulatory functions, often controlled by different autonomic pathways. These can be described as “negative feedback loops,” which operate as closed loop system components that help maintain allostatic balance, while allowing adaptation to environmental demands (Lehrer and Eddie, 2013). During HRV biofeedback, the amplitude of heart rate oscillations grows to many times the amplitude at rest, while the pattern becomes simple and sinusoidal. This pattern occurs in almost everyone, and is often achievable within a fraction of a minute even in persons who have never previously been exposed to the technique. The mechanism for this effect lies in a confluence of processes: (1) phase relationships between heart rate oscillations and breathing at specific frequencies, (2) phase relationships between heart rate and blood pressure oscillations at specific frequencies, (3) activity of the baroreflex, and (4) resonance characteristics of the cardiovascular system.


During normal breathing, one of the many oscillations in heart rate usually occurs at the same frequency as breathing. People often breathe at differing frequencies at different times, and various individuals tend to breathe at different rates. For most people, most of the time, breathing frequency is between 0.15 and 0.4 Hz, or 9 to 24 breaths per minute. The corresponding oscillations in heart rate are called RSA, which can be interpreted as influences of respiration on the sinoatrial node of the heart. The frequency range of 0.15–0.4 Hz is the “high frequency” (HF) band in the HRV spectrum, and spectral amplitude within this range is often used as an index of RSA (Berntson et al., 1997). However, although RSA is often driven by breathing, it also may be influenced by respiratory pacemaker oscillations in the central nervous system, which occasionally differ from actual breathing. These processes might be influenced by external factors (e.g., sudden exercise or stress, sighs, etc.), where both pacemaker and actual respiration may both produce heart rate oscillations. These can sometimes occur at different frequencies and with different patterns, as shown in dissociation between RSA and breathing during mechanical ventilation (Van de Louw et al., 2010), apnea (Passino et al., 1997), and paced breathing (Song and Lehrer, 2003). At resting respiratory rates, the phase relationship between breathing and HR is far from synchronous, such that heart rate increases tend to follow inhalation at about the mid-breath point, and heart rate decreases follow exhalation also at about the mid-breath point (Vaschillo et al., 2002).

Respiratory sinus arrhythmia is known to have important regulatory functions. It controls the rate of gas exchange at the alveoli, such that heart rate tends to be higher when air in the lung is richest in oxygen, and exhalation occurs when carbon dioxide in the lung is highest. It is notable, however, that the partial out-of-phase relationship between heart rate and breathing is not the most efficient pattern for gas exchange. Animal experiments by Hayano et al. (1996) in Japan have found that gas exchange at the alveoli is most efficient when heart rate starts increasing at the beginning of inhalation, and starts decreasing just as exhalation starts, i.e., a 0° phase relationship. In these studies, denervated dogs were artificially ventilated, and heart rate oscillations were entirely controlled by a cardiac pacemaker, such that the phase relationship between respiration and heart rate could be experimentally manipulated, in three phase relationships: 0, 90, and 180° (the last of these corresponding to a pattern where heart rate started increasing at the beginning of each exhalation, and started decreasing at the beginning of each exhalation). They measured gas exchange in the alveoli, and found that it was greatest at the 0° phase relationship, at an intermediate level at the 90° phase relationship, and lowest at the 180° phase relationship. Perhaps the function of a partially out-of-phase phase relationship is to allow the greatest degree of flexibility to the organism, such that greater efficiency can be achieved during greater metabolic need, and less during decreased need. Phase relationship studies at various levels of metabolic need have not yet been done, so this interpretation must remain speculative.

Respiratory sinus arrhythmia also can reflect aspects of autonomic function. It is controlled entirely by the vagus nerve, such that vagus nerve outputs to the sinoatrial node primarily occur only during exhalation. Greater vagus nerve traffic will therefore produce greater amplitudes of RSA, such that many scientists equate RSA (or HF HRV) with “cardiac vagal tone,” or parasympathetic influence on the heart (Berntson et al., 1997). However, longer exhalations (Strauss-Blasche et al., 2000) and slower respiration (Eckberg et al., 1985; Grossman et al., 1991; Song and Lehrer, 2003) also may increase RSA amplitude, possibly independently of vagus nerve traffic, since vagus nerve output occurs for relatively longer periods of time with each breath.

Indeed, it has long been known that amplitude of HRV is systematically related to breathing frequency, with higher amplitudes achievable with slower respiration (Eckberg et al., 1985; Brown et al., 1993; Badra et al., 2001; Eckberg, 2003; Song and Lehrer, 2003). However, most studies find that maximum effects usually are achieved when breathing at a rate of approximately 0.1 Hz (six breaths per minute). Working in St. Petersburg, Russia, Vaschillo systematically studied relationships between breathing and heart rate, using a “transfer function analysis,” whereby the interplay between two oscillations is studied at different frequencies – i.e., different respiration rates. The maximum heart rate oscillations at respiratory frequency occurred at approximately 0.1 Hz (six breaths per minute), the one frequency at which heart rate oscillates with breathing at a 0° phase relationship, i.e., exactly in phase. Thus breathing at this frequency produces both the highest amplitude of RSA and the most efficient gas exchange.

It should also be noted that respiratory-induced changes in HRV may function as a positive feedback loop, spiraling further increases in HRV, by feedback from the heart to the central nervous system, through the vagal afferent system, as described below.

These results also suggest that, where HRV biofeedback produces a 0° phase relationship between heart rate and breathing, conditions requiring better gas exchange efficiency could show improvement. Consistent with this, there is evidence for better athletic performance after training in HRV biofeedback (Strack, 2003; Shaw, 2011; Paul and Garg, 2012) and that HRV biofeedback may help improve breathing symptoms and quality of life among patients with emphysema (Giardino et al., 2004).


Vaschillo’s early studies also showed systematic changes in phase relationships between heart rate and blood pressure, when the system was stimulated at various frequencies. For each person, he found, there was a specific frequency where heart rate changes per unit change in blood pressure were greatest. This frequency varied from individual to individual, but was ∼0.1 Hz. (In later research we refined the average frequency for highest heart rate oscillations to be at about 0.09 Hz, or 5.5 breaths per minute, with breath duration of about 11 s; Vaschillo et al., 2002.) When he examined phase relationships between heart rate and blood pressure, he found that, at this frequency, heart rate and blood pressure oscillated in a 180° phase relationship: i.e., completely out of phase, such that blood pressure began falling as soon as heart rate began rising, and blood pressure began rising as soon as heart rate began falling. This phase relationship strongly suggested that the mechanism for the high-amplitude heart rate oscillations was the baroreflex.


The baroreflex is a reflex mediated by blood pressure sensors in the aorta and carotid artery that help modulate blood pressure fluctuations (Eckberg and Sleight, 1992). Baroreceptors in the walls of these arteries detect stretching of the arteries as blood pressure increases. When blood pressure increases, the baroreflex causes immediate decreases in heart rate. As blood pressure falls, the baroreflex causes immediate increases in heart rate. Thus, when the system is stimulated at the specific frequency causing maximum heart rate oscillations and a 180° phase relationship between heart rate and blood pressure, effects of the stimulator are compounded by effects of the baroreflex. As external stimulation causes heart rate to rise, it also causes blood pressure to fall, thus causing an additional stimulus for heart rate to rise further; and as external stimulation causes heart rate to fall, it also causes blood pressure to rise, thus causing an additional stimulus for heart rate to fall further.

Because of the 0° phase relationship between heart rate and breathing at approximately the same frequency that external stimulation causes maximal stimulation to the baroreflex, breathing becomes a natural way to provide external stimulation to increase HRV. Conversely, each breath then stimulates the baroreflex. We have found large increases in baroreflex gain (number of beats per minute change in heart rate per 1 mm Hg change in blood pressure) during HRV biofeedback: i.e., the baroreflex operates more strongly (Lehrer et al., 2003). When HRV biofeedback is practiced twice daily at home over about a 3 month period, we also find increases in resting baroreflex gain (i.e., before people start practicing biofeedback in a given session; Lehrer et al., 2003). This demonstrated neuroplasticity in the baroreflex, and suggested that regular exercise of the reflex rendered it stronger. It also suggested that various conditions affected by blood pressure lability and baroreflex control may be affected by HRV biofeedback. Thus, there is a growing body of evidence that a course of HRV biofeedback can help hypertensive patients lower their blood pressures (Nolan et al., 2010; Wang et al., 2010; Lin et al., 2012).

Pathways of baroreflex neural control suggest other possible HRV biofeedback applications. The baroreflex is mediated through the nucleus tractus solitarius, located in the brain stem (Raven et al., 1997; Rogers et al., 2000; Polson et al., 2007; Arnold et al., 2009). This center communicates directly with the amygdala, a center for emotional control, in a pathway extending through the insula (Volz et al., 1990; Henderson et al., 2004). Perhaps it is for this reason that various studies have shown positive HRV biofeedback effects for treating anxiety and depression (Karavidas et al., 2007; Reiner, 2008; Siepmann et al., 2008; McCraty et al., 2009; Nada, 2009; Zucker et al., 2009; Henriques et al., 2011; Tan et al., 2011; Patron et al., 2013).


There is a large amount of evidence that people are more resilient – physically and emotionally – when HRV oscillation amplitudes are higher and more complex. Greater complexity, as measured by various calculations of fractal entropy, suggest the operation of multiple regulatory feedback loops. One can think of this as the system having multiple backup systems to regulate the body, and finely tune it to environmental and internal need. Thus individuals with low HRV have generally impaired function: i.e., they are physically (Volz et al., 1990; Henderson et al., 2004) or emotionally (Friedman and Thayer, 1998; Gorman and Sloan, 2000; Carney and Freedland, 2009; Kemp et al., 2010) sick, are older (Fukusaki et al., 2000; Valentini and Parati, 2009; Nunan et al., 2010; McNarry and Lewis, 2012), are less aerobically fit (De Meersman, 1993; Hautala et al., 2003; McNarry and Lewis, 2012; Boutcher et al., 2013), and, when greatly physically compromised, at greater risk of dying (Kudaiberdieva et al., 2007; Laitio et al., 2007; Chan, 2008; Politano et al., 2008; Ranpuria et al., 2008; Stein, 2008; Ahmad et al., 2009; Thayer et al., 2010; Christensen, 2012; Handa et al., 2012; Huikuri and Stein, 2013). Total HRV in these studies generally is measured by the standard deviation of normal beat-to-beat intervals, i.e., intervals controlled by central nervous system input to the sinoatrial node of the heart, rather than by abnormal cardiac function). People with simpler patterns of HRV appear to be similarly compromised (Otsuka et al., 1997; Srinivasan et al., 2002; Yeragani et al., 2002; Skinner et al., 2008a,b, 2009; Huikuri et al., 2009). For this reason, HRV is often seen as a measure of physical and emotional resilience. We have found that HRV biofeedback restores autonomic function that is suppressed when people are exposed experimentally to inflammatory cytokines (Lehrer et al., 2010). All frequencies are suppressed by these cytokines, much as happens when we catch the flu or are subjected to another inflammatory condition.


It is a physical principle that all oscillating feedback systems with a constant delay have the characteristic of resonance. A resonant system is one that, when stimulated, produces high-amplitude oscillations at a single frequency, recruiting or overshadowing other frequencies, to produce a sine wave oscillation with very high-amplitude (Başar, 1998). An example of this from everyday life is the so-called Larsen effect, where a high pitched squeal at a single frequency results from placing a microphone in front of a speaker, and stimulating the system with sound (Weaver and Lobkis, 2006).

The same thing appears to happen in the cardiovascular system. The constant delay appears to be caused by amount of blood in the system, although, theoretically, flexibility, and diameter of the blood vessels also should play a role. We have found that taller people and men, who have a greater blood supply than, respectively, shorter people and women, have lower resonance frequencies (Vaschillo et al., 2006). That is, independently, stimulation at lower frequencies causes heart rate oscillations with the highest amplitude in taller people and men. Independently of height, age, and weight have no effect on resonance frequency, nor does experience with repeated system stimulation by HRV biofeedback.

If resonance occurs in the cardiovascular system at approximately 0.1 Hz, it should not occur exclusively in response to breathing. Rather, any source of rhythmic stimulation that affects the cardiovascular system should produce the same effect. This has, in fact, been found for rhythmic muscle tension (Lehrer et al., 2009; Vaschillo et al., 2011), and rhythmical presentation of emotion-inducing pictures (Vaschillo et al., 2008).

There also is evidence that resonance may occur at lower frequencies than 0.1 Hz. There is some evidence for resonance at about 0.02–0.03 Hz. While the source of this resonance is not completely known, it is known that the highest amplitudes of blood pressure oscillations are achieved when the system is stimulated at approximately this frequency (Vaschillo et al., 2002). Oscillations in this range are thought to be controlled primarily by the alpha sympathetic system, and related to oscillations in vascular tone, which also is affected by the baroreflex (Vaschillo et al., 2012). Thus, when blood pressure increases, the blood vessels dilate; when blood pressure falls, blood vessels constrict. This causes an oscillation in both blood pressure and vascular tone, but at a lower frequency than for the heart rate limb of the baroreflex, because dilation and constriction of blood vessels is a slower process than speeding or slowing the heart. Little is known about biofeedback training to stimulate the system in this frequency range. However, it is known that experienced Zen monks tend to breathe in this very slow range (Lehrer et al., 1999). Oscillations in this range are also thought to be involved in reflexes controlling thermoregulation (Fleisher et al., 1996; Thayer et al., 1997; Matsumoto et al., 1999).


Several studies have reported that HRVB might be effective in reducing symptoms of depression and/or anxiety (Karavidas et al., 2007; Reiner, 2008; Siepmann et al., 2008; McCraty et al., 2009; Nada, 2009; Zucker et al., 2009; Henriques et al., 2011; Tan et al., 2011; Patron et al., 2013). These results led to speculation that some other mechanism might be at work beyond the baroreflex gains. One possible clue came from the recent research using vagal nerve stimulation for severe depression (and seizure disorders; Sackeim et al., 2001a,b; Nahas et al., 2005; Daban et al., 2008; George et al., 2008; Cristancho et al., 2011). An implanted electrical stimulation device is used to stimulate the vagal afferent pathways resulting in reduction of depressive symptoms. While this technique has not been subjected to larger random controlled trials, the preliminary pilot studies do raise interesting possibilities. It is known that the vagal afferent pathways affect brain areas known to be involved in affect regulation and mood (locus coeruleus, orbitofrontal cortex, insula, hippocampus, and amygdala; Grundy, 2002). In addition, there has been speculation that stimulation especially of the sub-diaphragmatic pathways through slow deeper breathing techniques might be stimulating these same pathways and thus having an effect on depressive/anxiety symptoms (Brown and Gerbarg, 2005a; Porges, 2011; Brown et al., 2013). We discovered some literature that offered the possibility that these pathways could be investigated using a technique called heart period evoked potentials (HEPs). Schandry and his colleagues had used this procedure to study interoception some years ago (Schandry, 1981, 2003; Schandry et al., 1986; Montoya et al., 1993; Critchley et al., 2004; Pollatos et al., 2005a,b; Gray et al., 2007). The HEP is a unique version of the usual evoked response (ERP) in that the R-wave of the ECG is used as a signal rather than being filtered out. Each heart beat then creates a large electrical signal to the brain which can be measured with surface electrodes. The above mentioned studies discovered that those subjects that had better interoception (ability to perceive their heart rates) produced a larger evoked potential presumably by way of the vagal afferent system. So if HRVB is, in fact, stimulating beneficial brain structures, we might see it reflected in the HEP. Thus far, two studies have supported this idea. In the first (MacKinnon et al., 2013), we examined the HEP waveform (it’s called an N250 because it produces a negative deflection at about 250 ms) at baseline in a resting state, during a negative emotion induction, during a positive emotion induction, and during a slow resonance breathing period. Figure ​2 shows the results.


N250 (in microvolts) evoked potential during various conditions.

As can be seen, the slow breathing condition was significantly more negative than the other conditions.

In a second study (Huang et al., 2014), we trained a group of 12 participants in HRVB over four sessions and compared them to a group of 13 participants who received EMG/relaxation training again over four sessions. As expected the HRVB group improved their HRV substantailly whereas the EMG comparison group did not (see Figure ​3).


Heart rate variability as measured by SDNN across sessions for the heart rate variability biofeedback group compared to the EMG/relaxation group.

More importantly, only the HRVB group showed changes in their HEP (see Figure ​4).


Heartbeat event related potential (HEP) at 250 μs for both groups pre vs. post-training (sign reversed).

These results support our speculations and those of Brown and Gerbarg:

“… voluntary control of breath patterns can affect ANS functions via vagal afferents to brainstem nuclei (nucleus tractus solitarius, parabrachial nucleus, locus coeruleus)…Our neurophysiologic model postulates that vagal afferents activate hypothalamic vigilance areas and enhance and enhance attention and alertness, whereas pathways through the thalamus quiet frontal cortical activity and reduce anxious worrying” (Brown and Gerbarg, 2005a,b, p. 713).

Of course, there are many other possible explanations for why the complex process that occurs with HRVB might reduce depression and/or anxiety (distraction, self-efficacy, etc.). However, HEP method might give us a tool to disentangle possible mechanisms of the intervention.


Because HRV biofeedback is apparently helpful to conditions involving various physiological systems (pain, anxiety, depression, COPD, blood pressure control, athletic performance, etc.), it is probable that a number of mechanisms are involved in various effects, in addition to baroreflex stimulation and effects of vagal afferents. Most of them have received little empirical attention, but they all deserve investigation at this point. Possible mechanisms include:


Parasympathetic activity is usually a component in the “relaxation response.” Stimulation of parasympathetic reflexes by HRV biofeedback may produce body autonomic activity characteristic of relaxation, and thus directly counter stress effects. One way this may occur is a mechanism that has been labeled “Accentuated Antagonism.” “Vagal ‘tone’ predominates over sympathetic tone at rest. Under normal physiological conditions, abrupt parasympathetic stimulation will inhibit tonic sympathetic activation and its effects at rest and during exercise. This response is known as ‘accentuated antagonism’ (Olshansky et al., 2008, p. 863)”. Presumably this aspect of the parasympathetic efferent system is strengthened with HRVB training. This may be at play in inhibiting sympathetic output to myofascial trigger points (Hubbard and Berkoff, 1993; Gevirtz et al., 1996; Hubbard, 1998). The work of the Aziz group in London (Hobson et al., 2008) has also demonstrated that slow breathing almost immediately prevents esophageal pain thresholds from dropping dramatically when acid is introduced to the stomach.


Because of the 0° phase relationship between breathing and heart rate during resonance frequency breathing, improved gas exchange may help people with respiratory diseases, and may even decrease respiratory drive in people with stress-induced hyperventilatory reactions.


Heart rate variability biofeedback involves paying close attention to nuances in breathing. This is very similar to what is done in mindfulness meditation exercises. The pathway here would be primarily mental: i.e., one cannot simultaneously worry about various concerns of the day while concentrating on relaxed breathing.


Effects on asthma may occur indirectly through effects of stretching epithelial tissue in the lung by deep breathing. It is known that only a single deep inhalation during a methacholine challenge can decrease airway reactivity to methacholine in asthma patients (Pellegrino et al., 1996; Marchal et al., 2002).


It is known that the vagal system interacts closely with the inflammatory system, such that increases in vagus nerve traffic (usually produced by electrical vagal stimulation) are associated with decreases in serum levels of various inflammatory cytokines (Borovikova et al., 2000; Tracey, 2002). One study did find a decrease in C-reactive proteins among hypertensive patients treated with HRV biofeedback (Nolan et al., 2012). In another study, we experimentally exposed healthy subjects to an inflammatory cytokine, lipopolysaccharide (Lehrer et al., 2010). Usually both sympathetic and parasympathetic activity is blocked by lipopolysaccharide. Although no biofeedback-induced decreases in inflammatory cytokines were found, the autonomic effects of inflammation were greatly modulated, indicating that a greater resiliency was preserved among individuals given HRV biofeedback.


In this paper we have tried to summarize possible mechanisms for the effectiveness of HRVB. We have been working under the assumption that increases baroreflex represented a viable marker of improved autonomic homeostasis or increased complexity. We have reviewed the evidence that led us to this conclusion, which now are somewhat established by our labs and others. We now speculate that in conjunction with this class of mechanisms, stimulation of the vagal afferent system may also play a role, especially in disorders of negative affectivity.

Conflict of Interest Statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.


  • Ahmad S., Tejuja A., Newman K. D., Zarychanski R., Seely A. J. (2009). Clinical review: a review and analysis of heart rate variability and the diagnosis and prognosis of infection.Crit. Care13:232 10.1186/cc8132 [PMC free article][PubMed][Cross Ref]
  • Arnold A. C., Shaltout H. A., Gallagher P. E., Diz D. I. (2009). Leptin impairs cardiovagal baroreflex function at the level of the solitary tract nucleus.Hypertension54 1001–1008 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.109.138065 [PMC free article][PubMed][Cross Ref]
  • Badra L. J., Cooke W. H., Hoag J. B., Crossman A. A., Kuusela T. A., Tahvanainen K. U., et al. (2001). Respiratory modulation of human autonomic rhythms.Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol.280 H2674–H2688 [PubMed]
  • Başar E. (1998). “Resonance phenomena in the brain, physical systems, and nature,” inBrain Functions and Oscillations ed.Başar E., editor. (Berlin: Springer Verlag; ). 10.1007/978-3-642-72192-2 [Cross Ref]
  • Berntson G. G., Bigger J. T., Jr., Eckberg D. L., Grossman P., Kaufmann P. G., Malik M., et al. (1997). Heart rate variability: origins, methods, and interpretive caveats.Psychophysiology34 623–648 10.1111/j.1469-8986.1997.tb02140.x [PubMed][Cross Ref]
  • Borovikova L. V., Ivanova S., Zhang M., Yang H., Botchkina G. I., Watkins L. R., et al. (2000). Vagus nerve stimulation attenuates the systemic inflammatory response to endotoxin.Nature405 458–462 10.1038/35013070 [PubMed][Cross Ref]
  • Boutcher S. H., Park Y., Dunn S. L., Boutcher Y. N. (2013). The relationship between cardiac autonomic function and maximal oxygen uptake response to high-intensity intermittent-exercise training.J. Sports Sci.31 1024–1029 10.1080/02640414.2012.762984 [PubMed][Cross Ref]
  • Brown R. P., Gerbarg P. L. (2005a). Sudarshan Kriya Yogic breathing in the treatment of stress, anxiety, and depression. Part II – clinical applications and guidelines.J. Altern. Complement. Med.11 711–717 10.1089/acm.2005.11.711 [PubMed][Cross Ref]
  • Brown R. P., Gerbarg P. L. (2005b). Sudarshan Kriya yogic breathing in the treatment of stress, anxiety, and depression: part I-neurophysiologic model.J. Altern. Complement. Med.11 189–201 10.1089/acm.2005.11.189 [PubMed][Cross Ref]
  • Brown R. P., Gerbarg P. L., Muench F. (2013). Breathing practices for treatment of psychiatric and stress-related medical conditions.Psychiatr. Cliin. North Am.36 121–140 10.1016/j.psc.2013.01.001 [PubMed][Cross Ref]
  • Brown T. E., Beightol L. A., Koh J., Eckberg D. L. (1993). Important influence of respiration on human R-R interval power spectra is largely ignored.J. Appl. Physiol.75 2310–2317 [PubMed]
  • Carney R. M., Freedland K. E. (2009). Depression and heart rate variability in patients with coronary heart disease.Cleve. Cliin. J. Med. 76(Suppl. 2), S13–S17 10.3949/ccjm.76.s2.03 [PMC free article][PubMed][Cross Ref]
  • Chan C. T. (2008). Heart rate variability in patients with end-stage renal disease: an emerging predictive tool for sudden cardiac death?Nephrol. Dial. Transplant.23 3061–3062 10.1093/ndt/gfn280 [PubMed][Cross Ref]
  • Christensen J. H. (2012). Cardiac autonomic dysfunction in hemodialysis patients assessed by heart rate variability.Minerva Urol. Nefrol.64 191–198 10.1111/j.1542-4758.2011.00529.x [PubMed][Cross Ref]
  • Cristancho P., Cristancho M. A., Baltuch G. H., Thase M. E., O’Reardon J. P. (2011). Effectiveness and safety of vagus nerve stimulation for severe treatment-resistant major depression in Clinical practice after FDA approval: outcomes at 1 year.J. Clin. Psychiatry72 1376–1382 10.4088/JCP.09m05888blu [PubMed][Cross Ref]
  • Critchley H. D., Wiens S., Rotshtein P., Ohman A., Dolan R. J. (2004). Neural systems supporting interoceptive awareness.Nat. Neurosci.7 189–195 10.1038/nn1176 [PubMed][Cross Ref]
  • Daban C., Martinez-Aran A., Cruz N., Vieta E. (2008). Safety and efficacy of Vagus Nerve Stimulation in treatment-resistant depression. A systematic review.J. Affect. Disord.110 1–15 10.1016/j.jad.2008.02.012 [PubMed][Cross Ref]
  • De Meersman R. E. (1993). Heart rate variability and aerobic fitness.Am. Heart. J.125 726–731 10.1016/0002-8703(93)90164-5 [PubMed][Cross Ref]
  • Eckberg D. L. (2003). The human respiratory gate.J. Physiol. 548(Pt 2), 339–352 10.1113/jphysiol.2002.037192 [PMC free article][PubMed][Cross Ref]
  • Eckberg D. L., Nerhed C., Wallin B. G. (1985). Respiratory modulation of muscle sympathetic and vagal cardiac outflow in man.J. Physiol.365181–196 [PMC free article][PubMed]
  • Eckberg D. L., Sleight P. (1992). Human Baroreflexes in Health and Disease. Oxford: Clarendon Press
  • Fleisher L. A., Frank S. M., Sessler D. I., Cheng C., Matsukawa T., Vannier C. A. (1996). Thermoregulation and heart rate variability.Clin. Sci.90 97–103 [PubMed]
  • Friedman B. H., Thayer J. F. (1998). Autonomic balance revisited: panic anxiety and heart rate variability.J. Psychosom. Res.44 133–151 10.1016/S0022-3999(97)00202-X [PubMed][Cross Ref]
  • Fukusaki C., Kawakubo K., Yamamoto Y. (2000). Assessment of the primary effect of aging on heart rate variability in humans.Clin. Auton. Res.10 123–130 10.1007/BF02278016 [PubMed][Cross Ref]
  • George M. S., Ward H. E., Jr., Ninan P. T., Pollack M., Nahas Z., Anderson B., et al. (2008). A pilot study of vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) for treatment-resistant anxiety disorders.Brain Stimul.1 112–121 10.1016/j.brs.2008.02.001 [PubMed][Cross Ref]
  • Gevirtz R. (2013). The promise of heart rate variability biofeedback: evidence-based applications.Biofeedback41 110–120 10.5298/1081-5937-41.3.01 [Cross Ref]
  • Gevirtz R., Hubbard D., Harpin E. (1996). Psychophysiologic treatment of chronic low back pain.Prof. Psychol. Res. Pract.27 561–566 10.1037/0735-7028.27.6.561 [Cross Ref]
  • Giardino N. D., Chan L., Borson S. (2004). Combined heart rate variability and pulse oximetry biofeedback for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: preliminary findings.Appl. Psychophysiol. Biofeedback29 121–133 10.1023/B:APBI.0000026638.64386.89 [PubMed][Cross Ref]
  • Gorman J. M., Sloan R. P. (2000). Heart rate variability in depressive and anxiety disorders.Am. Heart. J. 140(4 Suppl.), 77–83 10.1067/mhj.2000.109981 [PubMed][Cross Ref]
  • Gray M. A., Taggart P., Sutton P. M., Groves D., Holdright D. R., Bradbury D., et al. (2007). A cortical potential reflecting cardiac function.Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.104 6818–6823 10.1073/pnas.0609509104 [PMC free article][PubMed][Cross Ref]
  • Grossman P., Karemaker J., Wieling W. (1991). Prediction of tonic parasympathetic cardiac control using respiratory sinus arrhythmia: the need for respiratory control.Psychophysiology28 201–216 10.1111/j.1469-8986.1991.tb00412.x [PubMed][Cross Ref]
  • Grundy D. (2002). Neuroanatomy of visceral nociception: vagal and splanchnic afferent.Gut 51(Suppl. 1), i2–i5 10.1136/gut.51.suppl_1.i2 [PMC free article][PubMed][Cross Ref]
  • Handa R., Poanta L., Rusu D., Albu A. (2012). The role of heart rate variability in assessing the evolution of patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.Rom. J. Intern. Med.50 83–88 [PubMed]
  • Hautala A. J., Makikallio T. H., Kiviniemi A., Laukkanen R. T., Nissila S., Huikuri H. V., et al. (2003). Cardiovascular autonomic function correlates with the response to aerobic training in healthy sedentary subjects.Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol.285 H1747–H1752 10.1152/ajpheart.00202.2003 [PubMed][Cross Ref]
  • Hayano J., Yasuma F., Okada A., Mukai S., Fujinami T. (1996). Respiratory sinus arrhythmia: a phenomenon improving pulmonary gas exchange and circulatory efficiency.Circulation94 842–847 10.1161/01.CIR.94.4.842 [PubMed][Cross Ref]
  • Henderson L. A., Richard C. A., Macey P. M., Runquist M. L., Yu P. L., Galons J. P., et al. (2004). Functional magnetic resonance signal changes in neural structures to baroreceptor reflex activation.J. Appl. Physiol.96 693–703 10.1152/japplphysiol.00852.2003 [PubMed][Cross Ref]
  • Henriques G., Keffer S., Abrahamson C., Horst S. J. (2011). Exploring the effectiveness of a computer-based heart rate variability biofeedback program in reducing anxiety in college students.Appl. Psychophysiol. Biofeedback36 101–112 10.1007/s10484-011-9151-4 [PubMed][Cross Ref]
  • Huang C., Gevirtz R., Onton J., Criado J. (2014). Investigation of vagal afferent functioning using heartbeat event related potentials.Paper Presented at the 45th Annual Meeting of the Association for Applied Psychophysiology and Biofeedback Savannah, GA
  • Hobson A. R., Furlong P. L., Aziz Q. (2008). Oesophageal afferent pathway sensitivity in non-erosive reflux disease.Neurogastroenterol. Motil.20 877–883 10.1111/j.1365-2982.2008.01122.x [PubMed][Cross Ref]
  • Hubbard D. (1998). Persistent muscular pain: approaches to relieving trigger points.J. Musculoskelat. Med.15 16–26
  • Hubbard D. R., Berkoff G. M. (1993). Myofascial trigger points show spontaneous needle EMG activity.Spine18 1803–1807 10.1097/00007632-199310000-00015 [PubMed][Cross Ref]
  • Huikuri H. V., Perkiomaki J. S., Maestri R., Pinna G. D. (2009). Clinical impact of evaluation of cardiovascular control by novel methods of heart rate dynamics.Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. A Math. Phys. Eng. Sci.367 1223–1238 10.1098/rsta.2008.0294 [PubMed][Cross Ref]
  • Huikuri H. V., Stein P. K. (2013). Heart rate variability in risk stratification of cardiac patients.Prog. Cardiovasc. Dis.56 153–159 10.1016/j.pcad.2013.07.003 [PubMed][Cross Ref]
  • Ivanov P. C., Amaral L. A., Goldberger A. L., Havlin S., Rosenblum M. G., Struzik Z. R., et al. (1999). Multifractality in human heartbeat dynamics.Nature399 461–465 10.1038/20924 [PubMed][Cross Ref]
  • Karavidas M. K., Lehrer P. M., Vaschillo E., Vaschillo B., Marin H., Buyske S., et al. (2007). Preliminary results of an open label study of heart rate variability biofeedback for the treatment of major depression.Appl. Psychophysiol. Biofeedback32 19–30 10.1007/s10484-006-9029-z [PubMed][Cross Ref]
  • Kemp A. H., Quintana D. S., Gray M. A., Felmingham K. L., Brown K., Gatt J. M. (2010). Impact of depression and antidepressant treatment on heart rate variability: a review and meta-analysis.Biol. Psychiatry67 1067–1074 10.1016/j.biopsych.2009.12.012 [PubMed][Cross Ref]
  • Kudaiberdieva G., Gorenek B., Timuralp B. (2007). Heart rate variability as a predictor of sudden cardiac death.Anadolu. Kardiyol. Derg. 7(Suppl. 1),68–70 [PubMed]
  • Laitio T., Jalonen J., Kuusela T., Scheinin H. (2007). The role of heart rate variability in risk stratification for adverse postoperative cardiac events.Anesth. Analg.105 1548–1560 10.1213/01.ane.0000287654.49358.3a [PubMed][Cross Ref]
  • Lehrer P., Eddie D. (2013). Dynamic processes in regulation and some implications for biofeedback and biobehavioral interventions.Appl. Psychophysiol. Biofeedback38

Leave a Comment


Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *